<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212096</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the tax and interest demands, dismissing the appeal in that regard. However, the decision on penalties was remanded to the first Appellate Authority to ensure a fair opportunity for the appellant in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the taxability of clearing and forwarding activities, including the inclusion of expenses in the assessable value, emphasizing the importance of a thorough examination and fair hearing in penalty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212096</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the tax and interest demands, dismissing the appeal in that regard. However, the decision on penalties was remanded to the first Appellate Authority to ensure a fair opportunity for the appellant in penalty proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the taxability of clearing and forwarding activities, including the inclusion of expenses in the assessable value, emphasizing the importance of a thorough examination and fair hearing in penalty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>