<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212089</link>
    <description>Commission for arranging reinsurance placements for Indian insurers was not taxable as fees for technical services because the intermediary and advisory functions did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipients. The activity was treated as facilitation or brokerage, not treaty-covered consultancy, so the receipts fell outside Article 13(4)(c) of the India-United Kingdom DTAA and section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Once the principal addition failed, the related royalty-based and interest issues did not survive, and the additional royalty grounds were not entertained as they did not arise from the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212089</link>
      <description>Commission for arranging reinsurance placements for Indian insurers was not taxable as fees for technical services because the intermediary and advisory functions did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the recipients. The activity was treated as facilitation or brokerage, not treaty-covered consultancy, so the receipts fell outside Article 13(4)(c) of the India-United Kingdom DTAA and section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Once the principal addition failed, the related royalty-based and interest issues did not survive, and the additional royalty grounds were not entertained as they did not arise from the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>