<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and the addition under Section 41(1). The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to consider the additional ground for TDS expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of un-recouped cost of production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and the addition under Section 41(1). The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to consider the additional ground for TDS expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of un-recouped cost of production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>