<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding duty liability on re-imported goods purchased by the appellant. It agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) on assessing the customs duty based on the damaged goods&#039; transaction value at the time of sale. The judgment stressed the significance of considering salvage and re-importation circumstances in determining customs duty obligations, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation and evidence to support claims in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding duty liability on re-imported goods purchased by the appellant. It agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) on assessing the customs duty based on the damaged goods&#039; transaction value at the time of sale. The judgment stressed the significance of considering salvage and re-importation circumstances in determining customs duty obligations, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation and evidence to support claims in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>