<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212064</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications computed eligibility on the aggregate value of clearances from a factory by one or more manufacturers, so clearances made for the appellant and on behalf of a loan-licensee had to be clubbed. The notification scheme did not permit simultaneous use of full exemption for one set of clearances and Modvat or concessional-duty treatment for another set from the same factory where the aggregate clearances formed one block. Export clearances were outside the home-consumption computation base and had to be excluded from the aggregate value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212064</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications computed eligibility on the aggregate value of clearances from a factory by one or more manufacturers, so clearances made for the appellant and on behalf of a loan-licensee had to be clubbed. The notification scheme did not permit simultaneous use of full exemption for one set of clearances and Modvat or concessional-duty treatment for another set from the same factory where the aggregate clearances formed one block. Export clearances were outside the home-consumption computation base and had to be excluded from the aggregate value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>