<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 777 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an application for rectification of mistake, citing that Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act does not grant power to condone delays. Despite referencing a previous case, the Tribunal clarified that it lacked authority to condone the 178-day delay. The application for rectification of mistake was consequently dismissed, as the Tribunal emphasized that the cited case law did not establish a precedent for condoning delays in such applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 777 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an application for rectification of mistake, citing that Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act does not grant power to condone delays. Despite referencing a previous case, the Tribunal clarified that it lacked authority to condone the 178-day delay. The application for rectification of mistake was consequently dismissed, as the Tribunal emphasized that the cited case law did not establish a precedent for condoning delays in such applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>