<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212060</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods was examined in the context of their use only for manufacture of an intermediate product, spirit, before conversion into denatured spirit as the final dutiable product. The analysis states that Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allows credit only where the capital goods are used in the manufacture of the final product, and that a mere role in producing an exempt intermediate product is insufficient unless it forms part of a continuous manufacturing process leading directly to the dutiable product. On limitation, the extended period was considered unsustainable for the earlier demand because the record did not clearly establish suppression or undisclosed facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212060</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods was examined in the context of their use only for manufacture of an intermediate product, spirit, before conversion into denatured spirit as the final dutiable product. The analysis states that Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allows credit only where the capital goods are used in the manufacture of the final product, and that a mere role in producing an exempt intermediate product is insufficient unless it forms part of a continuous manufacturing process leading directly to the dutiable product. On limitation, the extended period was considered unsustainable for the earlier demand because the record did not clearly establish suppression or undisclosed facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>