<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212057</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ appeals, affirming that the exemption under Section 24(4) does not apply to information related to allegations of corruption. The orders of the Chief Information Commissioner directing the public authority to provide the requested information were upheld. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the appeals failed, with the court emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in a democratic society.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212057</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ appeals, affirming that the exemption under Section 24(4) does not apply to information related to allegations of corruption. The orders of the Chief Information Commissioner directing the public authority to provide the requested information were upheld. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the appeals failed, with the court emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in a democratic society.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>