<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 249 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212050</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the loans given to the appellant did not qualify as being in the ordinary course of business due to being interest-free and not aligning with profit motives. The Court found that lending money was not a substantial part of the lending company&#039;s business, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 249 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212050</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the loans given to the appellant did not qualify as being in the ordinary course of business due to being interest-free and not aligning with profit motives. The Court found that lending money was not a substantial part of the lending company&#039;s business, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>