<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212048</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that Rule 8D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is prospective and applies from the assessment year 2008-09, directing the matter to be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer in light of this ruling. Emphasizing compliance with previous judgments, the Court highlighted the importance of consistency in applying legal provisions. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the directions from previous judgments, ensuring uniformity and adherence to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212048</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that Rule 8D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is prospective and applies from the assessment year 2008-09, directing the matter to be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer in light of this ruling. Emphasizing compliance with previous judgments, the Court highlighted the importance of consistency in applying legal provisions. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the directions from previous judgments, ensuring uniformity and adherence to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>