<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212036</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that customs authorities were not obligated to pay demurrage/container charges. The petitioner&#039;s failure to take delivery of goods, internal disputes among partners, and delayed response to the show cause notice influenced the decision. The court emphasized that detention certificates do not absolve shipping/warehousing companies from demurrage charges unless exceptional circumstances warrant. The outcome did not impact a separate civil suit by the Shipping Corporation of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212036</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that customs authorities were not obligated to pay demurrage/container charges. The petitioner&#039;s failure to take delivery of goods, internal disputes among partners, and delayed response to the show cause notice influenced the decision. The court emphasized that detention certificates do not absolve shipping/warehousing companies from demurrage charges unless exceptional circumstances warrant. The outcome did not impact a separate civil suit by the Shipping Corporation of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>