https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212016 The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal challenging the Tribunal's order on service tax liability. The Court held that the payment made for technology transfer was actually for moulds usage and not subject to service tax. The Court emphasized that the activity did not fall under Consulting Engineer services, thus no service tax was due. Additionally, the High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the rate of duty/tax issue, directing the revenue to appeal to the Apex Court for such matters. The appeal was rejected, and certified copies of orders were to be returned to the Department for further action. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212016 The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal challenging the Tribunal's order on service tax liability. The Court held that the payment made for technology transfer was actually for moulds usage and not subject to service tax. The Court emphasized that the activity did not fall under Consulting Engineer services, thus no service tax was due. Additionally, the High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the rate of duty/tax issue, directing the revenue to appeal to the Apex Court for such matters. The appeal was rejected, and certified copies of orders were to be returned to the Department for further action. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212016