https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211991 Bail conditions may regulate attendance and cooperation, but they cannot become punitive or compel an accused person to give incriminating evidence. The court upheld the monetary bail bond and surety requirement as not oppressive in light of the alleged economic offence, but struck down the conditions requiring daily presence and restricted movement because they effectively operated as detention and infringed the constitutional protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3). The petitioner was left bound to appear only when summoned and to answer non-incriminating questions. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211991 Bail conditions may regulate attendance and cooperation, but they cannot become punitive or compel an accused person to give incriminating evidence. The court upheld the monetary bail bond and surety requirement as not oppressive in light of the alleged economic offence, but struck down the conditions requiring daily presence and restricted movement because they effectively operated as detention and infringed the constitutional protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3). The petitioner was left bound to appear only when summoned and to answer non-incriminating questions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211991