<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on a respondent-company and Director for clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. Despite the Commissioner (Appeals) annulling the penalties, the Tribunal reinstated them due to substantial shortages and the Director&#039;s admission. The Tribunal criticized the Appeals Commissioner for not considering the Director&#039;s admission statements. However, in line with a High Court decision, the Tribunal allowed the respondent-company to pay reduced penalties within a specified timeframe, setting aside the Appeals Commissioner&#039;s orders and restoring the original penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on a respondent-company and Director for clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. Despite the Commissioner (Appeals) annulling the penalties, the Tribunal reinstated them due to substantial shortages and the Director&#039;s admission. The Tribunal criticized the Appeals Commissioner for not considering the Director&#039;s admission statements. However, in line with a High Court decision, the Tribunal allowed the respondent-company to pay reduced penalties within a specified timeframe, setting aside the Appeals Commissioner&#039;s orders and restoring the original penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>