https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211976 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of timely filing of appeals. The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of communication. The Tribunal accepted the official record of the order's service date as conclusive evidence, rejecting the appellants' claims based on insufficient evidence. The settled law precluded condoning delays beyond the specified period, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no grounds for interference and upheld the dismissal due to untimely filing. en-us Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211976 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of timely filing of appeals. The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of communication. The Tribunal accepted the official record of the order's service date as conclusive evidence, rejecting the appellants' claims based on insufficient evidence. The settled law precluded condoning delays beyond the specified period, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no grounds for interference and upheld the dismissal due to untimely filing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211976