<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211974</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the summons issued by the Excise authorities, emphasizing the importance of upholding statutory procedures and the necessity of measures to prevent tax evasion. The court&#039;s decision underscored the legal framework supporting the issuance of summons by Excise authorities and the broader objective of combating tax evasion through appropriate legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211974</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the summons issued by the Excise authorities, emphasizing the importance of upholding statutory procedures and the necessity of measures to prevent tax evasion. The court&#039;s decision underscored the legal framework supporting the issuance of summons by Excise authorities and the broader objective of combating tax evasion through appropriate legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>