https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211966 Where the Central Excise Act provided an appeal to the CESTAT against the order rejecting remission of duty and the order confirming duty demand on goods destroyed by fire, the revision forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the matter. The orders did not fall within the statutory exception in the first proviso to section 35B(1), so the proper appellate remedy lay before the Tribunal and not by revision to the Government. The revision application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211966 Where the Central Excise Act provided an appeal to the CESTAT against the order rejecting remission of duty and the order confirming duty demand on goods destroyed by fire, the revision forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the matter. The orders did not fall within the statutory exception in the first proviso to section 35B(1), so the proper appellate remedy lay before the Tribunal and not by revision to the Government. The revision application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211966