https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211959 The KERALA HIGH COURT upheld the Ext. P6 order directing a pre-deposit of tax amount confirmed but granted six weeks for compliance, emphasizing the need to demonstrate financial hardship. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for full waiver due to insufficient evidence of economic constraints. The decision highlights the importance of presenting a strong case with supporting evidence, particularly on financial hardship, when challenging tax-related orders. The court's ruling indirectly addressed the concern regarding coercive recovery steps by providing a reasonable timeframe for compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. en-us Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211959 The KERALA HIGH COURT upheld the Ext. P6 order directing a pre-deposit of tax amount confirmed but granted six weeks for compliance, emphasizing the need to demonstrate financial hardship. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for full waiver due to insufficient evidence of economic constraints. The decision highlights the importance of presenting a strong case with supporting evidence, particularly on financial hardship, when challenging tax-related orders. The court's ruling indirectly addressed the concern regarding coercive recovery steps by providing a reasonable timeframe for compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211959