<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1427 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211951</link>
    <description>Whether dispatches from the assessee&#039;s factory to its own out-of-State godowns/branch offices constituted inter-State sales under s. 3(a) CST Act or mere branch/stock transfers was determined by examining whether the movement of goods was pursuant to, or a necessary incident of, a contract of sale. The SC held that correspondence styled as &quot;allocations/forecasts&quot; was, on facts, composite indents specifying model, quantity and delivery destinations, forming firm orders under a five-year sales arrangement; branch offices functioned only as conduits. The assessing authority&#039;s document-based finding, affirmed by the State Tax Tribunal, was not perverse. The transactions were held to be inter-State sales exigible to CST, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1427 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211951</link>
      <description>Whether dispatches from the assessee&#039;s factory to its own out-of-State godowns/branch offices constituted inter-State sales under s. 3(a) CST Act or mere branch/stock transfers was determined by examining whether the movement of goods was pursuant to, or a necessary incident of, a contract of sale. The SC held that correspondence styled as &quot;allocations/forecasts&quot; was, on facts, composite indents specifying model, quantity and delivery destinations, forming firm orders under a five-year sales arrangement; branch offices functioned only as conduits. The assessing authority&#039;s document-based finding, affirmed by the State Tax Tribunal, was not perverse. The transactions were held to be inter-State sales exigible to CST, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>