<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim, stating that the appellants could not claim a refund after availing Modvat credit on the duty paid for the pipes used in the service activity. The decision was grounded on the principle that seeking a refund would result in a double benefit, as the value of the bare pipes was already factored into the service value calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim, stating that the appellants could not claim a refund after availing Modvat credit on the duty paid for the pipes used in the service activity. The decision was grounded on the principle that seeking a refund would result in a double benefit, as the value of the bare pipes was already factored into the service value calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>