<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not sufficiently prove grounds for a full waiver of the service tax demand. Consequently, the appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set timeframe, with non-compliance leading to the vacation of stay and dismissal of the appeal. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to tax laws and the repercussions of non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not sufficiently prove grounds for a full waiver of the service tax demand. Consequently, the appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a set timeframe, with non-compliance leading to the vacation of stay and dismissal of the appeal. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to tax laws and the repercussions of non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>