<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 217 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211943</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash orders by the Commissioner and Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, which refused to stay tax demand and issued a garnishee order. The court noted the significant tax liability and rejected the petitioner&#039;s request for interim stay due to their sound financial position. Emphasizing the absence of provisions in the Income Tax Act to assist the petitioner, the court upheld the authorities&#039; orders, highlighting the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s financial position in tax matters. The writ petition was dismissed without expressing an opinion on the underlying controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 217 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211943</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash orders by the Commissioner and Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, which refused to stay tax demand and issued a garnishee order. The court noted the significant tax liability and rejected the petitioner&#039;s request for interim stay due to their sound financial position. Emphasizing the absence of provisions in the Income Tax Act to assist the petitioner, the court upheld the authorities&#039; orders, highlighting the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s financial position in tax matters. The writ petition was dismissed without expressing an opinion on the underlying controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>