<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition without giving the AO a hearing and misapplying the High Court decision on Section 50C. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh assessment with input from the District Valuation Officer. The AO must allow the assessee a fair chance to present their case, and cooperation was expected. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition without giving the AO a hearing and misapplying the High Court decision on Section 50C. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh assessment with input from the District Valuation Officer. The AO must allow the assessee a fair chance to present their case, and cooperation was expected. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>