<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211932</link>
    <description>Interest on income-tax refund received by a non-resident with a project office in India was examined under the India-USA DTAA to determine whether it fell within the specific interest article or was attributable to the permanent establishment. The Tribunal applied the effective-connection test and treated &quot;attributable to&quot; in Article 11(5) as substantively equivalent to &quot;effectively connected.&quot; It found that the refund interest did not become connected to the permanent establishment merely because the underlying tax had been deducted from business receipts. The interest was therefore taxable only as interest under Article 11(2), not under Article 11(5) read with Article 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211932</link>
      <description>Interest on income-tax refund received by a non-resident with a project office in India was examined under the India-USA DTAA to determine whether it fell within the specific interest article or was attributable to the permanent establishment. The Tribunal applied the effective-connection test and treated &quot;attributable to&quot; in Article 11(5) as substantively equivalent to &quot;effectively connected.&quot; It found that the refund interest did not become connected to the permanent establishment merely because the underlying tax had been deducted from business receipts. The interest was therefore taxable only as interest under Article 11(2), not under Article 11(5) read with Article 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>