<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 917 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211926</link>
    <description>Customs description cannot be rejected as false without cogent evidence when the test report shows a mixed fatty-acid composition rather than a clear false declaration. On valuation, where contemporaneous imports of identical goods are available at different prices, the lowest comparable transaction value must be adopted under the applicable valuation rule, absent evidence of any extra consideration. On that basis, the enhanced value, consequential duty and penalties were found unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside on both description and valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 917 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211926</link>
      <description>Customs description cannot be rejected as false without cogent evidence when the test report shows a mixed fatty-acid composition rather than a clear false declaration. On valuation, where contemporaneous imports of identical goods are available at different prices, the lowest comparable transaction value must be adopted under the applicable valuation rule, absent evidence of any extra consideration. On that basis, the enhanced value, consequential duty and penalties were found unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside on both description and valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>