<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. Detailed directions were given for the AO to reconsider specific issues in accordance with legal provisions and precedents. The disallowance of Usance Interest under Section 40(a)(i) was upheld, considering it as interest subject to TDS. The inclusion of unutilized Modvat Credit in closing stock value was affirmed, with adjustments to opening stock directed. Disallowance of prior period expenses was upheld but to be allowed in relevant years after verification. Penalties imposed by the AO were canceled as the disallowances were not deemed as concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 190 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. Detailed directions were given for the AO to reconsider specific issues in accordance with legal provisions and precedents. The disallowance of Usance Interest under Section 40(a)(i) was upheld, considering it as interest subject to TDS. The inclusion of unutilized Modvat Credit in closing stock value was affirmed, with adjustments to opening stock directed. Disallowance of prior period expenses was upheld but to be allowed in relevant years after verification. Penalties imposed by the AO were canceled as the disallowances were not deemed as concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>