<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 865 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211888</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the civil appeal, emphasizing that the appellant, as a declarant, had an obligation to transport goods outside West Bengal. Failure to produce the endorsed declaration copy raised a legal presumption of tax evasion. The court underscored compliance with regulatory measures to prevent tax evasion, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument that certain sections applied only to transporters, not Customs House Agents. The court did not address the appellant&#039;s request for penalty payment in instalments and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 865 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211888</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the civil appeal, emphasizing that the appellant, as a declarant, had an obligation to transport goods outside West Bengal. Failure to produce the endorsed declaration copy raised a legal presumption of tax evasion. The court underscored compliance with regulatory measures to prevent tax evasion, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument that certain sections applied only to transporters, not Customs House Agents. The court did not address the appellant&#039;s request for penalty payment in instalments and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>