<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 364 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the reassessment proceedings were invalid. The assessee&#039;s income was deemed exempt under Section 10(23C)(iiiad), and the denial of exemption under Section 11 and disallowance of depreciation were considered unjustified. Consequently, the issues concerning the maximum marginal rate of tax were rendered inconsequential due to the absence of taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 364 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the reassessment proceedings were invalid. The assessee&#039;s income was deemed exempt under Section 10(23C)(iiiad), and the denial of exemption under Section 11 and disallowance of depreciation were considered unjustified. Consequently, the issues concerning the maximum marginal rate of tax were rendered inconsequential due to the absence of taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>