<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211877</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that the chemist shop operated by the charitable hospital was ancillary to its primary philanthropic purpose and not the dominant object of the trust. The Chief CIT&#039;s denial of continuation of exemption under s. 10(23C)(via) was found to be a misapplication of law for elevating an incidental activity into the trust&#039;s main purpose. The HC set aside the Chief CIT&#039;s order and directed reconsideration of the exemption application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 172 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211877</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that the chemist shop operated by the charitable hospital was ancillary to its primary philanthropic purpose and not the dominant object of the trust. The Chief CIT&#039;s denial of continuation of exemption under s. 10(23C)(via) was found to be a misapplication of law for elevating an incidental activity into the trust&#039;s main purpose. The HC set aside the Chief CIT&#039;s order and directed reconsideration of the exemption application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>