<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 170 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the banks were not obligated to deduct TDS as the rent paid to each co-owner was below Rs.1,20,000 per annum, and the co-owners had definite and ascertainable shares. The Assessing Officer&#039;s orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were set aside, confirming the banks were not in default. The appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 170 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the banks were not obligated to deduct TDS as the rent paid to each co-owner was below Rs.1,20,000 per annum, and the co-owners had definite and ascertainable shares. The Assessing Officer&#039;s orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were set aside, confirming the banks were not in default. The appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>