<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211872</link>
    <description>HC upheld the assessing officer&#039;s block-assessment additions, finding the assessee&#039;s sworn admissions and title deeds seized in search established undisclosed income and discharged the department&#039;s burden. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of personal-expenditure additions was reversed as improper, since purchases and personal-expenditure additions are distinct and the assessee&#039;s parents&#039; payments did not satisfactorily explain the years 1989-90 to 1992-93. A Rs.3 lakh addition for 1993-94 was also sustained where the assessee produced no credible evidence and offered contradictory explanations about the source of funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211872</link>
      <description>HC upheld the assessing officer&#039;s block-assessment additions, finding the assessee&#039;s sworn admissions and title deeds seized in search established undisclosed income and discharged the department&#039;s burden. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of personal-expenditure additions was reversed as improper, since purchases and personal-expenditure additions are distinct and the assessee&#039;s parents&#039; payments did not satisfactorily explain the years 1989-90 to 1992-93. A Rs.3 lakh addition for 1993-94 was also sustained where the assessee produced no credible evidence and offered contradictory explanations about the source of funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>