<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 359 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211867</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration under Section 254(2) within six months. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the legal position post-amendment of Section 36(1)(vii), which allowed deductions for bad debts by writing them off in the books of accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 359 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211867</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration under Section 254(2) within six months. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the legal position post-amendment of Section 36(1)(vii), which allowed deductions for bad debts by writing them off in the books of accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>