https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211852 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the department's decision to deny the benefit of a notification and uphold the demand based on an extended period. The tribunal found that the demand was issued beyond the six-month limitation under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and noted that the appellant had disclosed relevant information, refuting the department's claim of suppression. The tribunal solely based its decision on the limitation of time, without considering the case's merits, and allowed the appeal. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211852 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the department's decision to deny the benefit of a notification and uphold the demand based on an extended period. The tribunal found that the demand was issued beyond the six-month limitation under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and noted that the appellant had disclosed relevant information, refuting the department's claim of suppression. The tribunal solely based its decision on the limitation of time, without considering the case's merits, and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211852