https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211829 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleting the addition of unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of the cash expenditure through a notarized confirmation letter from the cousin and a copy of her passport, indicating her visit to India. The lack of further inquiries or contradictory evidence from the AO rendered the addition unjustified, leading to the decision to overturn it. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211829 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleting the addition of unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of the cash expenditure through a notarized confirmation letter from the cousin and a copy of her passport, indicating her visit to India. The lack of further inquiries or contradictory evidence from the AO rendered the addition unjustified, leading to the decision to overturn it. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211829