<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 145 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211821</link>
    <description>On a prima facie assessment of the appellants&#039; role as project financiers and the later transfer of the project on default, the Tribunal found no immediate violation of the Customs Act, 1962 that would justify penalty liability at this stage. It therefore held that the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty imposed under Section 112(b) and granted stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 145 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211821</link>
      <description>On a prima facie assessment of the appellants&#039; role as project financiers and the later transfer of the project on default, the Tribunal found no immediate violation of the Customs Act, 1962 that would justify penalty liability at this stage. It therefore held that the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty imposed under Section 112(b) and granted stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>