<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 864 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211808</link>
    <description>Section 11E(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 permits reopening of a deemed assessment where the Commissioner is satisfied on information or otherwise that the dealer has filed an incorrect turnover statement or incorrect particulars of sales, followed by a reasonable opportunity of hearing in reassessment. The provision does not require the show-cause notice itself to record the reasons or disclose the materials forming that satisfaction unless the statute expressly says so. A reopening notice is intended to inform the dealer and enable a reply, and its validity is not defeated merely because detailed reasons are absent. On that basis, the challenge to the notice failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 864 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211808</link>
      <description>Section 11E(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 permits reopening of a deemed assessment where the Commissioner is satisfied on information or otherwise that the dealer has filed an incorrect turnover statement or incorrect particulars of sales, followed by a reasonable opportunity of hearing in reassessment. The provision does not require the show-cause notice itself to record the reasons or disclose the materials forming that satisfaction unless the statute expressly says so. A reopening notice is intended to inform the dealer and enable a reply, and its validity is not defeated merely because detailed reasons are absent. On that basis, the challenge to the notice failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>