<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211799</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. Issues (A), (B), (F), and (G) were resolved in favor of the assessee based on prior judgments. Issues (D) and (E) did not raise substantial questions of law due to the absence of an appeal by the Revenue. Issue (C) was resolved affirmatively in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Issues (H) and (I) were remanded for fresh decisions by the Tribunal and the Assessing Officer, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211799</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. Issues (A), (B), (F), and (G) were resolved in favor of the assessee based on prior judgments. Issues (D) and (E) did not raise substantial questions of law due to the absence of an appeal by the Revenue. Issue (C) was resolved affirmatively in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Issues (H) and (I) were remanded for fresh decisions by the Tribunal and the Assessing Officer, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>