<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 116 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211786</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that consideration paid by Indian customers to foreign suppliers for the right to use software/computer programs constituted &#039;royalty&#039; under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the obligation to deduct tax at the source, aligning with precedents and affirming taxation of such payments in India. This decision clarified the legal framework on royalty payments, ensuring consistent interpretation and tax implications for similar transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 116 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211786</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that consideration paid by Indian customers to foreign suppliers for the right to use software/computer programs constituted &#039;royalty&#039; under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the obligation to deduct tax at the source, aligning with precedents and affirming taxation of such payments in India. This decision clarified the legal framework on royalty payments, ensuring consistent interpretation and tax implications for similar transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>