<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Sections 271G and 271AA of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had presented required documentation to the Transfer Pricing Officer, who did not dispute it. The delay in filing Form 3CEB was due to reasonable causes, leading to the cancellation of penalties. The Tribunal agreed that the documentation was timely and complete, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Sections 271G and 271AA of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had presented required documentation to the Transfer Pricing Officer, who did not dispute it. The delay in filing Form 3CEB was due to reasonable causes, leading to the cancellation of penalties. The Tribunal agreed that the documentation was timely and complete, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>