<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the errors in the original return were clerical in nature and not intentional, as the assessee promptly revised the computation of income upon realizing the mistakes. The Tribunal found no evidence of deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the errors in the original return were clerical in nature and not intentional, as the assessee promptly revised the computation of income upon realizing the mistakes. The Tribunal found no evidence of deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>