<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211781</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a detailed assessment by the Assessing Officer regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and Section 194J. The judgment highlighted the distinction between claimed deductions and reimbursements, underscoring the importance of factual verification in determining the applicability of disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211781</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a detailed assessment by the Assessing Officer regarding the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and Section 194J. The judgment highlighted the distinction between claimed deductions and reimbursements, underscoring the importance of factual verification in determining the applicability of disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>