<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 732 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211771</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Original, denying the rebate claim due to discrepancies in export documents. The case involved issues such as export beyond the stipulated period, missing crucial details in shipping bills, lack of correlation between documents, and failure to comply with statutory requirements. The Government found that the hidden particulars in the documents made verification impossible, and essential details were missing, rendering the documents improper. The export was conducted late, without necessary extensions, further weakening the claim&#039;s admissibility. Ultimately, the Government ruled in favor of denying the rebate claim based on non-compliance with statutory conditions and failure to prove duty-paid goods&#039; export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 732 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211771</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the Order-in-Original, denying the rebate claim due to discrepancies in export documents. The case involved issues such as export beyond the stipulated period, missing crucial details in shipping bills, lack of correlation between documents, and failure to comply with statutory requirements. The Government found that the hidden particulars in the documents made verification impossible, and essential details were missing, rendering the documents improper. The export was conducted late, without necessary extensions, further weakening the claim&#039;s admissibility. Ultimately, the Government ruled in favor of denying the rebate claim based on non-compliance with statutory conditions and failure to prove duty-paid goods&#039; export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>