<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1081 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211767</link>
    <description>Processes that merely improve the decorative appeal or market value of already usable and marketable rough die cast aluminium tiles do not amount to manufacture where no new commodity with a different basic character emerges. Cleaning, buffing, lacquering, grinding and electroplating were therefore treated as insufficient to create a distinct product, and the Cenvat credit claimed on the inputs was held inadmissible. The resulting demand and penalty were sustained, with the appeal failing in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1081 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211767</link>
      <description>Processes that merely improve the decorative appeal or market value of already usable and marketable rough die cast aluminium tiles do not amount to manufacture where no new commodity with a different basic character emerges. Cleaning, buffing, lacquering, grinding and electroplating were therefore treated as insufficient to create a distinct product, and the Cenvat credit claimed on the inputs was held inadmissible. The resulting demand and penalty were sustained, with the appeal failing in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>