<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, classifying the service under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The demand raised beyond one year was deemed unsustainable due to lack of mala fide. Appellants were liable for demands within the normal period with interest, but penalties were waived under Section 80. Consequential relief was granted to the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 408 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, classifying the service under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The demand raised beyond one year was deemed unsustainable due to lack of mala fide. Appellants were liable for demands within the normal period with interest, but penalties were waived under Section 80. Consequential relief was granted to the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>