<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211756</link>
    <description>The Court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the reopening of the assessment for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court found that the reasons provided for reopening, including discrepancies in trust funds and capital expenditure, lacked sufficient evidence of non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. Additionally, as a previous judgment had already addressed and disallowed the additions sought by the Revenue, the Court held that the second ground for reopening the assessment could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211756</link>
      <description>The Court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the reopening of the assessment for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court found that the reasons provided for reopening, including discrepancies in trust funds and capital expenditure, lacked sufficient evidence of non-disclosure of material facts by the assessee. Additionally, as a previous judgment had already addressed and disallowed the additions sought by the Revenue, the Court held that the second ground for reopening the assessment could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>