<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1084 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 12,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance duty, interest, and penalty requirement waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the unavoidability of accidents for duty remission claims under Rule 21, highlighting the significance of evidence like police reports to substantiate claims effectively. The decision to mandate a partial deposit due to insufficient evidence underscores the importance of thorough documentation and substantiation in duty remission cases for securing favorable outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1084 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 12,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance duty, interest, and penalty requirement waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the unavoidability of accidents for duty remission claims under Rule 21, highlighting the significance of evidence like police reports to substantiate claims effectively. The decision to mandate a partial deposit due to insufficient evidence underscores the importance of thorough documentation and substantiation in duty remission cases for securing favorable outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>