<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 105 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant society to deposit a certain amount within a specified period and stay the recovery of the balance amount pending appeal, subject to compliance being reported. The decision emphasizes the importance of considering factual matrix and retrospective amendments in determining Service Tax liability, assessing suppression of facts, and categorizing services correctly. It showcases the Tribunal&#039;s balanced approach in ensuring compliance while providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 105 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant society to deposit a certain amount within a specified period and stay the recovery of the balance amount pending appeal, subject to compliance being reported. The decision emphasizes the importance of considering factual matrix and retrospective amendments in determining Service Tax liability, assessing suppression of facts, and categorizing services correctly. It showcases the Tribunal&#039;s balanced approach in ensuring compliance while providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>