<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. It directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of discounting charges on debentures proportionately over the debenture holding period in line with the Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in decision-making and adherence to legal provisions under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. It directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of discounting charges on debentures proportionately over the debenture holding period in line with the Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in decision-making and adherence to legal provisions under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>