<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 93 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211709</link>
    <description>The Court clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s order was subject to the High Court&#039;s decision on the restoration application. Emphasizing the finality of the High Court&#039;s order, it dismissed the appeals due to non-compliance with previous Tribunal orders. The Court directed the Registry to notify the High Court for further action, underscoring the Tribunal&#039;s relationship with the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 93 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211709</link>
      <description>The Court clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s order was subject to the High Court&#039;s decision on the restoration application. Emphasizing the finality of the High Court&#039;s order, it dismissed the appeals due to non-compliance with previous Tribunal orders. The Court directed the Registry to notify the High Court for further action, underscoring the Tribunal&#039;s relationship with the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>