<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 924 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211708</link>
    <description>DEPB entitlement linked to FOB value could not be recalculated by substituting Present Market Value, as there was no legal basis for treating the declared FOB value as interchangeable with domestic market value. The Tribunal found that the alleged excess benefit was computed on an incorrect understanding of the scheme, so the foundation for confiscation failed. With no sustainable basis for confiscation and the goods not being available for confiscation, redemption fine was inappropriate, and the penalties on the firm and its partner also could not survive. The order-in-original was therefore set aside in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 924 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211708</link>
      <description>DEPB entitlement linked to FOB value could not be recalculated by substituting Present Market Value, as there was no legal basis for treating the declared FOB value as interchangeable with domestic market value. The Tribunal found that the alleged excess benefit was computed on an incorrect understanding of the scheme, so the foundation for confiscation failed. With no sustainable basis for confiscation and the goods not being available for confiscation, redemption fine was inappropriate, and the penalties on the firm and its partner also could not survive. The order-in-original was therefore set aside in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>